<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>John Hunter's blog posts (all time)</title>
    <description>Selected management posts from John Hunter's blogs. 1 new item is added to the feed every day from the previously published blog posts.</description>
    <link>http://johnhunter.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Good Customer Service Example</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/26/no-more-lean-excuses/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I bought a new digital camera,&amp;nbsp;Canon A700. Part of the reason I bought it was I had heard they actually provided customer service &amp;ndash; you could call them and they answered and helped (plus they have long practiced good management improvement concepts, in general).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well I received my camera and I could not open the battery compartment: which was quite frustrating. I tried following the instructions but I couldn&amp;rsquo;t get it to open. So I tried calling Canon and I got a person on the phone within 30 seconds (there was system to direct me to the right person but it was as speaking the answer to a couple questions).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within a couple minutes the service person (based in Virginia and a Canon employee, as I understand it) had picked up a Canon A700 and explained how to open the door.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/26/no-more-lean-excuses/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good Customer Service Example</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/26/no-more-lean-excuses/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I received my camera and I could not open the battery compartment: which was quite frustrating. I tried following the instructions but I couldn&amp;rsquo;t get it to open. So I tried calling Canon and I got a person on the phone within 30 seconds&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/26/no-more-lean-excuses/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Secrets of the World’s Best Companies</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/secrets-of-the-worlds-best-companies/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/deming/"&gt;Dr. W. Edwards Deming&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said there is&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/19/the-deming-difference/"&gt;no instant pudding for management&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;a href="http://curiouscatmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/10/quick-fix.html"&gt;no quick fix&lt;/a&gt;). And management requires customization to the organization. You cannot just copy management practices from one place, where they are successful, to another. You can learn from what has been successful and adopt it to your organization if you have knowledge and theory and know how to test (&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/pdsa"&gt;pdsa&lt;/a&gt;) the effectiveness of new ideas in your organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="more-207"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t find many of the &amp;ldquo;secrets&amp;rdquo; mentioned in the article to be the greatest ideas for management (the best ideas I find among the thoughts of Deming,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/experts/russell-ackoff"&gt;Ackoff&lt;/a&gt;, Ohno, Provost, Csikszentmihalyi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://management.curiouscat.net/authors/144-Roger-Hoerl"&gt;Hoerl&lt;/a&gt;, etc..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, I believe it is good to learn about what others are doing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/secrets-of-the-worlds-best-companies/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Secrets of the World’s Best Companies</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/secrets-of-the-worlds-best-companies/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;... great management ideas are found in the thoughts of leading management thinkers (now it is true most I think most &amp;ldquo;writings or speeches of gurus and consultants&amp;rdquo; don&amp;rsquo;t provide much use but the right thinkers do offer great value).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Dr. W. Edwards Deming said there is &lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/19/the-deming-difference/"&gt;no instant pudding for management&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://curiouscatmanagement.blogspot.com/2005/10/quick-fix.html"&gt;no quick fix&lt;/a&gt;). And management requires customization to the organization. You cannot just copy management practices from one place, where they are successful, to another. You can learn from what has been successful and adopt it to your organization if you have knowledge and theory and know how to test (&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/pdsa"&gt;PDSA&lt;/a&gt;) the effectiveness of new ideas in your organization...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/secrets-of-the-worlds-best-companies/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fear Remains a Toyota Motivator</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/fear-remains-a-toyota-motivator/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;First, don&amp;rsquo;t let the title fool you, this is not an indication Toyota is going against &lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/demings14points"&gt;Deming&amp;rsquo;s obligation of management&lt;/a&gt; to &amp;ldquo;Drive out fear and build trust so that everyone can work effectively&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than being drawn to improve it is most often stated as being scared that if we don&amp;rsquo;t we will have to pay for failing to improve. Thus the reference to fear.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/23/fear-remains-a-toyota-motivator/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lean Thinking and Management</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/20/lean-thinking-and-management/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that we should acknowledge the paucity of success stories for improving the practice of management. The failures of management are not minor. The problems are large and the successes seem limited. The biggest thing I think we need to learn from this is that improving management is not easy. The concepts may seem simple but most of us can look around and see much more Dilbert Boss behavior than lean thinking behavior. And the gap between those two types of behavior seems to rise as you go &amp;ldquo;up&amp;rdquo; the organization chart.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/20/lean-thinking-and-management/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Design of Experiments</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/using-design-of-experiments/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Design of Experiments can seem complicated but at the core it is fairly simple and powerful. By applying the proper techniques it allows you to gage the effect of several variables and, very importantly, the interactions of those variables with a small number of experiments (or tests or pilots).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.net/authors/1-George-E-P-Box"&gt;George Box&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is a wonderful author (and friend) who can write for mangers who are not knowledgeable about statistics and statisticians.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://williamghunter.net/george-box-articles/statistics-for-discovery"&gt;Statistics for Discovery&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;does a good job of explaining how organizations should use experiments to improve.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/using-design-of-experiments/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deming and Toyota</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/deming-and-toyota/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe Toyota applied Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas to create a management system and continued to develop that system to create the Toyota Production System (also known as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/leanthinking.cfm"&gt;lean manufacturing&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/deming-and-toyota/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Design of Experiments</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/using-design-of-experiments/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Design of Experiments can seem complicated but at the core it is fairly simple and powerful. By applying the proper techniques it allows you to gage the effect of several variables and, very importantly, the interactions of those variables with a small number of experiments (or tests or pilots)...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/17/using-design-of-experiments/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Six Sigma Won’t Fix Bad Management?</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/15/six-sigma-wont-fix-bad-management/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Like most management concepts how it is applied varies tremendously. If one just uses some tools that are part of the &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma tool kit&amp;rdquo; (mostly tools from TQM and the like) then you might improve bad management only marginally.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="more-201"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if you read the work of&amp;nbsp;Roger Hoerl, Soren Bisgaard, Forrest Breyfogle III&amp;hellip; and learn and apply what they talk about as Six Sigma you will definitely have to address bad management practices. Their Six Sigma is definitely a management improvement system (you can&amp;rsquo;t apply their concepts of Six Sigma without fixing many bad management practices).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/15/six-sigma-wont-fix-bad-management/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Six Sigma Won’t Fix Bad Management?</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/15/six-sigma-wont-fix-bad-management/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Like most management concepts how it is applied varies tremendously. If one just uses some tools that are part of the &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma tool kit&amp;rdquo; (mostly tools from TQM and the like) then you might improve bad management only marginally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if you read the work of &lt;a href="https://management.curiouscat.net/authors/144-Roger-Hoerl"&gt;Roger Hoerl&lt;/a&gt;, Soren Bisgaard, Forrest Breyfogle III&amp;hellip; and learn and apply what they talk about as Six Sigma you will definitely have to address bad management practices...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/15/six-sigma-wont-fix-bad-management/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving the 401(k) System</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/08/18/improving-the-401k-system/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many people don&amp;rsquo;t even take advantage of a 401(k) to save for their retirement. From a public policy perspective it creates a huge long term problem. The economy will end up with millions of people that didn&amp;rsquo;t save for retirement and will be a drain on those who did save for retirement and the rest of the economy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Congress actually passed a good revision to the law. Employers will now be required to default to having employees save for their retirement in 401(k) plans. The employee still has the option to decline doing so, but now, without such a choice, they will automatically save for retirement.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/08/18/improving-the-401k-system/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not Lean Retailing</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/01/not-lean-retailing/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing is wrong with major decisions being made by the leaders but the article leaves the impression many non-major decisions are cetralized too. That is a problem for those who believe in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/guides/"&gt;management improvement ideas&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;including lean thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again moving away from good lean management ideas such as: longevity of management, focus on value of employees rather than cost of employees&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/01/not-lean-retailing/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory in Practice</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/28/theory-in-practice/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Knowledge is built upon theory&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;hellip; Rational prediction requires theory and builds knowledge through systematic revision and extention of theory based on comparison of prediction with observation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;W. Edwards Deming, page 102,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0262541165/worldwidedemingw"&gt;The New Economics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/28/theory-in-practice/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Made in the USA Back In Vogue? (2006)</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/28/made-in-the-usa/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This example provides more evidence of the benefits of "lean manufacturing," though it seems they are getting only a few benefits (reduction of waste, faster resupply of "hot items") and they may well not know about &amp;lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/leanthinking.cfm"&amp;gt;lean thinking&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;.&amp;nbsp; By studying and applying lean ideas they should be able to reduce the 45 day turn-around time.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps they should read the Fashion Incubator blog...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/28/made-in-the-usa/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovation at Toyota in Developing the Prius</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/24/innovation-at-toyota/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the end of 1993 the development team had determined that higher oil prices and a growing middle class around the world would require the new car to be both roomy and fuel-efficient. Other than that, they were given no guidance. &amp;ldquo;I was trying to come up with the future direction of the company,&amp;rdquo; says Watanabe, who headed corporate planning at the time. &amp;ldquo;I didn&amp;rsquo;t have a very specific idea about the vehicle.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Investing in innovation is risky. If successful, the benefits can build a competitive advantage that is difficult for others to eliminate. However, others will try and if you fail to execute as well in the future those benefits can disappear quickly. Toyota shows few signs of letting others catch up though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/24/innovation-at-toyota/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovation at Toyota</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/24/innovation-at-toyota/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While targets and goals can distract from improvement some guidance is useful. If the desire to is have incremental improvement one strategy may be reasonable but if the desire is to aim for huge improvement another strategy is likely required...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/24/innovation-at-toyota/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quality Customer Focus</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/21/quality-customer-focus/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Customers expectations change over time. Often what was once enough to delight a customer (remote control for a TV) becomes expected. Once a feature is expected the organization gets no credit for providing it they only risk a negative reaction if they fail to provide it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/21/quality-customer-focus/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quality Customer Focus</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/21/quality-customer-focus/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/kanomodel"&gt;Kano model of Customer Satisfaction&lt;/a&gt;: Kano saw three types of customer satisfaction: required (basic quality also threshold requirements), more is better (performance quality) and delighter (excitement quality).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Customers expectations change over time. Often what was once enough to delight a customer (remote control for a TV) becomes expected...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/21/quality-customer-focus/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visible Data</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/18/visible-data/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Take the time to find the important measures and then don&amp;rsquo;t keep data hidden in some drawer or computer file out of people&amp;rsquo;s view and therefore out of mind. Post the important data for everyone to see. Review the data as changes are made and see that the changes had the desired result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/18/visible-data/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visible Data</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/18/visible-data/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Take the time to find the important measures and then don&amp;rsquo;t keep data hidden in some drawer or computer file out of people&amp;rsquo;s view and therefore out of mind. Post the important data for everyone to see. Review the data as changes are made and see that the changes had the desired result. Update the measures when appropriate...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/18/visible-data/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Appraisal Problems</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/15/performance-appraisal-problems/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are no easy answers, but what it should be about is managing the system to produce the best results. My best advice is to read chapter 9 of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0070580286/worldwidedemingw"&gt;The Leader&amp;rsquo;s Handbook&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and read the rest of the Leader&amp;rsquo;s Handbook and other&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/books/management/start"&gt;great management improvement books&lt;/a&gt;. And manage using the ideas of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/deming/guide"&gt;Deming&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/experts/russell-ackoff"&gt;Ackoff&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.pscholtes.com/"&gt;Scholtes&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.curiouscat.com/guides/mcgregorbio.cfm"&gt;McGregor&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/experts/taiichi-ohno"&gt;Ohno&lt;/a&gt;&amp;hellip;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/15/performance-appraisal-problems/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Organization, Systems and Culture</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/organization-systems-and-culture/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Management improvement is mainly about using great ideas that have been around for years and decades.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Useful, innovative new management ideas are great. But far too much effort is placed in trying to package "systems" (or copyrighted terms) as some new breakthrough in management when most often they offer little of value.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/organization-systems-and-culture/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota Special Report: Thinking Production System</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/toyota-special-report-thinking-production-system/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Minoura warns &amp;ldquo;simply introducing kanban cards or andon boards doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean you&amp;rsquo;ve implemented the Toyota Production System, for they remain nothing more than mere tools. The new information technologies are no exception, and they should also be applied and implemented as tools.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early in his career, Minoura worked under Taiichi Ohno, recognized as the creator of the Toyota Production System. Ohno, through tireless trial and error, managed to put into practice a &amp;ldquo;pull&amp;rdquo; system that stopped the factory producing unnecessary items. But Minoura observes that it was only by developing this &amp;ldquo;loose collection of techniques&amp;rdquo; into a fully-fledged system, dubbed the Toyota Production System or TPS, that they were able to deploy this throughout the company&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/toyota-special-report-thinking-production-system/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota Special Report: Thinking Production System</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/toyota-special-report-thinking-production-system/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This short article is peppered with many great quotes as section headers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In TPS, the T also stands for Thinking&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To cut lead-time, cut out all the bits that don't add value.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The line must stop if there is a problem.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Ask yourself Why? five times.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Develop people who can come up with unique ideas.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/13/toyota-special-report-thinking-production-system/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning, Systems and Improvement</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/06/learning-systems-and-improvement/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Errors of omission, lost opportunities, are generally more critical than errors of commission. Organizations fail or decline more frequently because of what they did not do than because of what they did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The corrective action is itself the result of a decision. A record of this decision should be made and treated as the original decision. In this way the process can not only yield learning but also learning how to learn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A record of the entire process (all four steps) should be made and stored for easy access by those who may later be confronted by the need to make a similar type of decision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Russel Ackoff&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/06/learning-systems-and-improvement/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning, Systems and Improvement</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/06/learning-systems-and-improvement/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Errors of omission, lost opportunities, are generally more critical than errors of commission. Organizations fail or decline more frequently because of what they did not do than because of what they did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Russel Ackoff&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/02/06/learning-systems-and-improvement/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change is not Improvement</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/25/change-is-not-improvement/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We trained hard&amp;hellip; but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion; inefficiency, and demoralization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These lines, from the Satyricon of Petronius written 2,000 years ago&amp;hellip;*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*&amp;nbsp;Unfortunately it seems this quote is not actually his.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/25/change-is-not-improvement/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change is not Improvement</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/25/change-is-not-improvement/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0787902578/worldwidedemingw"&gt;The Improvement Guide&lt;/a&gt;: the Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance, is an excellent handbook on making changes that are improvements rather than just a way to create the illusion of progress. The book uses three simple questions to frame the improvement strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What are we trying accomplish?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;How will we know that a change is an improvement?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What changes can we make that will result in improvement?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/25/change-is-not-improvement/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management Excellence</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/23/management-excellence/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most management practices cannot be plugged into any organization and work well. That practice must be applied in a sensible way given the organizational system. Learning how lean ideas (or other good ideas) are applied in varying systems can provide insight into how to integrate ideas for organizational improvement from those applying lean practices.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/23/management-excellence/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management Excellence</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/23/management-excellence/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think the question of what other companies have management practices worth studying is interesting. The answer could be very helpful as others could learn from what those organizations do. There are at least two difficulties in identifying those organizations: 1) defining what set of criteria would indicate successful organizations 2) most often even companies that are doing many things well leave much to be desired...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/23/management-excellence/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great Charts</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/great-charts/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.karlhartig.com/chart/chart.html"&gt;Karl Hartig displays some excellent charts&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that he created (for the Wall Street Journal) on his web site. The charts seem very similar to what would result from applying Edward Tufte&amp;rsquo;s ideas. Rarely do I see charts that do such a good job of visually displaying data. The lack of such effective visual display of information is another example of how much improvement could be made just by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscatmanagement.blogspot.com/2006/01/management-lessons-from-terry-ryan.html"&gt;applying ideas that are already published&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/great-charts/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Defects</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I do not believe you succeed by declaring your goal to be zero defects. You succeed by creating a culture of never ending improvement, of customer focus, of fact based decision making, of learning, of &amp;ldquo;empowerment&amp;rdquo;&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part of that improvement is reducing variation, reducing defects, implementing smart new mistake proofing but innovation is too. Effectively zero defects is not really achievable in most cases. Defects are largely a matter of definition. As performance improves expectations will often rise. When you eliminate anything you would have called a defect years ago, standards are higher and things that would not have been called defects are no longer acceptable. At some point the system process advances to such a level where zero defects is possible in some cases but in many (say medical care, air transportation, education, computer software, restaurants, government, management consulting, civil engineering, legal services&amp;hellip;) I really think it is basically impossible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Defects</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that eliminating defects that get to customers (and even those that don&amp;rsquo;t) is wise. But I think that doing so is the result of continually improving your processes. I do not believe you succeed by declaring your goal to be zero defects. You succeed by creating a culture of never ending improvement, of customer focus, of fact based decision making, of learning...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management Improvement Leaders</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/17/management-improvement-leaders/</link>
      <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/experts/russell-ackoff"&gt;Russell Ackoff&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; frankly I find it difficult to imagine a list management thought leader list, not including his name. Organizational development, systems thinking, management improvement, planning, policy deployment, learning.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://management.curiouscat.net/authors/1-George-E-P-Box"&gt;George Box&lt;/a&gt;: statistics, design of experiments, finding solutions (problem solving, process improvement), learning, management improvement&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/17/management-improvement-leaders/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Sector Management (part II)</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/12/public-management-ii/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Deming did acknowledge that the United States government was not designed to be as efficient as possible. From page 198 of&amp;nbsp;Out of the Crisis&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;&lt;strong&gt;Government service is to be judged on equity as well as on efficiency.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;rdquo; He then quotes Oscar Ornati &amp;ldquo;We have forgotten that the function of government is more equity oriented than efficiency oriented.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deming did not focus on the nature of government extensively, but my recollection is that he acknowledged the wisdom of the American style of government (with checks and balances and fairly complex process for creating legislation) even though parts of that system intentionally makes change difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/12/public-management-ii/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Customer Service is Important</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/10/customer-service-is-important/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My experience did not give me the impression they were focused much on what was important to me as a customers. The service I received seemed to be what I would expect from a company very focused on the idea that the objective of the company is to increase profits &lt;strong&gt;at the expense of everyone else&lt;/strong&gt;. Two models of organization provide a very different customer experience.&amp;nbsp; One&amp;nbsp;that sees customers as fools to be fleeced seems common among USA arilines, health care providers, cable companies, large banks, car dealers and phone companies.&amp;nbsp; The idea that organizations exists to provide customers value and the company takes a profit for providing that value sadly seem rare in the USA (though some organizations behave this way: Trader Joe's, many credit unions, many small restaurants and Apple (though some may disagree with me placing them here).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/10/customer-service-is-important/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agility vs. Six Sigma</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/08/agility-vs-six-sigma/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some people dislike the idea of managing processes. In my experience they then invent the idea that slow, boring process improvement is an alternative to innovation. That is just wrong. Process improvement should be part of a well run system, as should innovation. Deming, who many believe focused only process improvement, knew the importance of both.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/deming/innovation"&gt;See several of Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas on innovation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/08/agility-vs-six-sigma/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Sector Management Using Deming's Ideas</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/07/the-public-sector-and-deming/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Madison&amp;rsquo;s quality improvement efforts began after then-Mayor James F. Sensenbrenner and his staff were exposed to the teaching of W. Edwards Deming in 1983. A pilot project at the motor equipment division made substantial improvements in prioritizing repairs, improving communications with customers, reducing steps in the inventory purchasing process and, ultimately, reducing vehicle down time, all of which saved money and improved service at the same time. Based on the success of the pilot, it was decided to expand the philosophy throughout city government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/07/the-public-sector-and-deming/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goofy but Widespread Thinking</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/04/management-lessons-from-terry-ryan/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;rsquo;t really understand why people seem unwilling to do the simple known things to improve performance. But there does seem to be the attitude that we need to find secret or fantastic new ideas in order to improve.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span id="more-398"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;People seem to think: &amp;ldquo;I can't just read some idea in a book published 30 years ago and improve.&amp;nbsp;If it were&amp;nbsp;that easy everyone would be doing it.&amp;rdquo; Well it isn&amp;rsquo;t quite that easy but it is close.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/04/management-lessons-from-terry-ryan/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quality, SPC and Your Career</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/24/quality-spc-and-your-career/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Success is not as easy as we might hope. Just discovering the ideas of Deming or Toyota or Ackoff is not enough. The great ideas don&amp;rsquo;t, by themselves, convince managers to try a new way of managing. There is a great deal of education needed for most organizations to get to the point where they realize they could improve by applying &amp;ldquo;old&amp;rdquo; ideas such as: &lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/controlchart"&gt;control charts&lt;/a&gt;, lean thinking, &lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/spc.cfm"&gt;spc&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/variation.cfm"&gt;not tampering&lt;/a&gt;&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/24/quality-spc-and-your-career/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota's Planet Kaizen</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/18/planet-kaizen/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It requires flash to view Planet Kaizen. I think it has amazingly bad visual controls (as do many flash applications). I can&amp;rsquo;t figure out why it would be done in flash &amp;ndash; other than some marketing person, or IT person, thought it would be cool. I certainly don&amp;rsquo;t see how &lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/kaizen.cfm"&gt;kaizen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;practices could have produced such an application. It seems to me one of the examples of how far Toyota still has to go.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span id="more-153"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Of course, as an automobile manufacturer failing to develop web applications well, is better than failing at manufacturing cars well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/18/planet-kaizen/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Process Improvement of the Order Fulfillment Process</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/17/joel-management/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shipping an international order now takes about 35 seconds, down from 3 minutes, and can be done by anyone, whether or not they have SQL and Mail Merge skills. Domestic orders are even faster since they don&amp;rsquo;t need customs forms. Most of all, it&amp;rsquo;s all really fun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/17/joel-management/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poka-Yoke Assembly</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/12/poka-yoke-assembly/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/pokayoke.cfm"&gt;Poka-Yoke&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(mistake-proofing) is one of my favorite ideas. I just love the idea of not only making something that works well but making something that is difficult to use&amp;nbsp;misuse or use in a way that&amp;nbsp;leads to problems, waste and disappointment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/12/poka-yoke-assembly/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peter Drucker Opinion Essays from the Wall Street Journal</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/10/drucker-opinion-essays-from-the-wsj/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Is Executive Pay Excessive?&amp;nbsp;In 1977, Peter Drucker's answer was, no. As pay did become excessive, Drucker became a prominent voice against the unjust pay of CEO&amp;rsquo;s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="more-385"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="cite"&gt;Economically, [the] few very large executive salaries are quite unimportant. Socially, they do enormous damage. They are highly visible and highly publicized. And they are therefore taken as typical, rather than as the extreme exceptions they are.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1977, he was mainly worried about &amp;ldquo;the public&amp;rdquo; rising against excessive executive pay when there was no systemic problem. He didn&amp;rsquo;t seem to foresee the problem of other CEO&amp;rsquo;s believing they were entitled to such &lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/the-economist-on-drucker/"&gt;unjust pay and creating the crisis of leadership this caused later in his career&lt;/a&gt;. Of course the entitlement culture was not a widely held view at that point.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/10/drucker-opinion-essays-from-the-wsj/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 70 Percent Solution</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/10/the-70-percent-solution/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google CEO Eric Schmidt:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We spend 70 percent of our time on core search and ads. We spend 20 percent on adjacent businesses, ones related to the core businesses in some interesting way. Examples of that would be Google News, Google Earth, and Google Local. And then 10 percent of our time should be on things that are truly new. An example there would be the Wi-Fi initiative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/10/the-70-percent-solution/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovate or "Play it Safe: to Avoid Risk</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/08/innovate-or-avoid-risk/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are many reasons why avoiding risks is smart and should be encouraged. But when avoiding risks stifles innovation the risks to the organization are huge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Playing it safe isn't always safe. In rapidly changing markets (which are quite common lately) "playing it safe" is often riskier than "taking chances" on new ideas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/08/innovate-or-avoid-risk/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Data Based Decision Making at Google and Elsewhere (2005)</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/06/data-based-decision-making/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google has done a fantastic job of using data to make decisions. In fact so much so, that some think they may go overboard trying to find an algorithm for everything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/deming/managewhatyoucantmeasure.cfm"&gt;can&amp;rsquo;t measure everything that is important&lt;/a&gt;. I also believe in most organizations the amount of stuff you can&amp;rsquo;t measure usefully and realistically is quite a bit higher than it is for Google. Having highly intelligent, skilled and experienced people who can derive complex formulas effectively does greatly expand the effective use of measurements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still there are limits, and those limits are much lower for most organizations that have neither, thousands of phd level mathematicians, rocket scientists, software engineers etc. nor a anything approaching Google&amp;rsquo;s percentage of such people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still I think we will benefit from the innovation that will continue to take place at Google. The are making great strides in using data to inform their decision making process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/06/data-based-decision-making/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poor Management Harms USA Manufactures (2005)</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/fords-wrong-turn/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The global competition in manufacturing is intense. But&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/10/30/manufacturing-and-the-economy/"&gt;America is still the largest manufacturer in the world&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and managers should not be allowed escape responsibility for their failure to manage effectively with claims that manufacturing in the USA cannot compete. The biggest change needed is an improvement in management. Other things would also help greatly, such as improving the health care system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/fords-wrong-turn/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: Ten Golden Rules (2005)</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/google-ten-golden-rules/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suits inside Google don&amp;rsquo;t fare much better than the outside pros. Several current and former insiders say there&amp;rsquo;s a caste system, in which business types are second-class citizens to Google&amp;rsquo;s valued code jockeys. They argue that it could prove to be a big challenge in the future as Google seeks to maintain its growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google really is doing things differently. One way you see it is that some of those used to being the most powerful players complain that they don&amp;rsquo;t get respect at Google, at Google the engineers rule. Um, maybe they shouldn&amp;rsquo;t complain too loud, maybe the reason Google is doing better is they focus on the Gemba (where value is added to the customer).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/google-ten-golden-rules/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance of People: Does Performance Appraisal Help?</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/performance-of-people-and-appraisal/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why can&amp;rsquo;t performance be numerically rated and ranked? It can&amp;rsquo;t be&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/operationaldefinition.cfm"&gt;defined operationally&lt;/a&gt;, it can&amp;rsquo;t be measured with any degree of precision, it can&amp;rsquo;t be separated from other effects, and it is destined to vary over time in any case. Any one of these factors present significant (if not insurmountable) problems itself. Combined the problems create an impossible barrier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/05/performance-of-people-and-appraisal/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excessive Executive Pay</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/04/excessive-executive-pay/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The excesses are so great now they will either force companies to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;take huge risks to justify such pay and then go bankrupt when such risks fail (and some will succeed making it appear, to some, that the pay was deserved rather than just the random chance of taking a large risk and getting lucky).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;make it impossible to compete with companies that don&amp;rsquo;t allow such excesses and slowly go out of business to those companies that don&amp;rsquo;t act so irresponsibly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;hope that competitors adopt your bad practice of excessive pay (this does have potential as most people are corrupted by power, even across cultural boundaries). However, my expectation is the competitive forces of capitalism going forward are going to make such a hope unrealistic. People will see the opportunity provided by such poor management and compete with them.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As long as the pay packages were merely large, and didn&amp;rsquo;t effect the ability of a company to prosper that could continue (slicing up the benefits between the stakeholders is not an exact science). The excesses recently have become so obscene as to become unsustainable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/04/excessive-executive-pay/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Landscaping Firm Applying Deming's Management Ideas</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/02/lanscaping-firm-following-deming/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each Brickman branch operates with a standard production model that the company developed in the late 1970s with consultant and renowned statistician W. Edwards Deming... Scott Brickman said the model emphasizes continuous improvements in communication with its nearly 10,000 commercial customers and education and cultivation of its employees to learn and advance within the company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/02/lanscaping-firm-following-deming/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota Manufacturing Powerhouse</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/28/toyota-manufacturing-powerhouse/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unusual among automakers, &amp;ldquo;they don&amp;rsquo;t hide a lot,&amp;rdquo; Coventry said. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s like going to the Super Bowl and having the opposite side throw their playbook on the table. It&amp;rsquo;s as if they feel they can still beat you on the field.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toyota has greatly advanced management practice worldwide through their actions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a reflection of Toyota&amp;rsquo;s team-oriented approach, its executive pay is paltry by U.S. standards. Analyst Ron Tadross at Banc of America Securities estimates the total annual compensation of Toyota&amp;rsquo;s CEO at under $1 million &amp;ndash; about as much as a vice president at GM or Ford Motor Co. makes in a good year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The executive pay crisis in America is a symptom of the failure of American management to understand their role. Executives are part of the system and have acted shamefully in allowing obscene pay for a few while claiming they must force others to suffer (due to &amp;ldquo;the market&amp;rdquo;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/28/toyota-manufacturing-powerhouse/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management Improvement Flavors</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/27/management-improvement/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some tools are much more common in one program, even if they are not limited to one program (such as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/doe"&gt;Design of Experiments&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;used heavily in six sigma). But design of experiments existed long before six sigma and was used by sensible people to improve for decades before six sigma.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest difference I see in the programs is the overall aim. And that overall aim affects everything else. I happen to be a fan of Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas. Most of these programs take a great deal from Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas. I believe Lean is closest to Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas (which makes sense as Lean is essentially the Toyota Production System TPS).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/27/management-improvement/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: Experiment Quickly and Often</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/25/google-experiment-quickly-and-often/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;this is basically piloting changes on a small scale, analyzing the results and repeating that quickly. Quick, frequent experimentation with iteration is a tactic all organizations would benefit from.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/25/google-experiment-quickly-and-often/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovation and Research and Development</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/innovation-and-research-and-development/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Innovation can be related to productivity improvement or it can be completely unrelated. A company could innovate with an ideas like the remote control for televisions (or&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.kiva.org/"&gt;microlending&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;air bags). That innovation may not contribute in any way to manufacturing televisions more productively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="more-137"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other innovation may be related to improving the productivity alone and add no additional functionality to the customer. Many innovations will provide a combination of both benefits. Both innovation and productivity improvement are important.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/innovation-and-research-and-development/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Economist on Drucker</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/the-economist-on-drucker/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the late 1990s he turned into one of America&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/12/04/excessive-executive-pay/"&gt;leading critics of soaring executive pay&lt;/a&gt;, warning that &amp;ldquo;in the next economic downturn, there will be an outbreak of bitterness and contempt for the super-corporate chieftains who pay themselves millions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/the-economist-on-drucker/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Failure to Improving Using the Ideas of Peter Drucker and Others</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/19/superior-customer-experiences/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many of their ideas are ignored. However, even so, his influence on management in America, and worldwide, has been significant and positive. The way I see it even though managers are only benefiting from say 20% of the wisdom of Deming or Drucker that could very well still make Deming or Drucker the most influential management expert.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Related: &lt;a href="https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2012/02/15/why-use-lean-if-so-many-fail-to-do-so-effectively/"&gt;Why Use Lean if So Many Fail To Do So Effectively&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/19/superior-customer-experiences/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Superior Customer Experiences Start with Respect for Employees</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/19/superior-customer-experiences/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oakley found that there is a direct link between employee satisfaction and customer satisfaction, and between customer satisfaction and improved financial performance. Employee satisfaction is a key antecedent to employee engagement. He also found that organizations with engaged employees have customers who use their products more, and increased customer usage leads to higher levels of customer satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a zero-sum game. Good managers grow the pie so all the stakeholders can get more benefit (customers, investors, employees&amp;hellip;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/19/superior-customer-experiences/</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
