<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>John Hunter's blog posts (all time)</title>
    <description>Selected posts by John Hunter on topics including management, investing, travel, engineering... 2 new items are added to the feed every day from his previously published blog posts.</description>
    <link>http://johnhunter.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Measurement and Data Collection</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/10/measurement-and-data-collection/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I find it useful to ask what will be done with the results of data collection efforts (in order to confirm that the effort is a wise use of resources). If you don&amp;rsquo;t have an answer for how you will use the data, once you get it, then you probably shouldn&amp;rsquo;t waste resources collecting it (and I find there is frequently no plan for using the results).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have found it helpful to ask: what will you do if the data we collect is 30? What will you do if it is 3? The answer does not need to be some formula, if 30 then x. But rather that the results would be used to help inform a decision process to make improvements (possibly the decision to focus resources in that area). I find, that asking that question often helps reach a better understanding of what data is actually needed, so you then collect better data.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/10/measurement-and-data-collection/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Six Sigma Pitfalls</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/07/six-sigma-pitfalls/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When people say &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma is great&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma is a waste&amp;rdquo; often they are talking about different things. But because in both instances &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma&amp;rdquo; is used people believe that the meaning must be the same in both cases. It often isn&amp;rsquo;t. While I find some Six Sigma efforts, books or consultants very useful many others (that also use the words &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma&amp;rdquo;) do not offer much of value.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span id="more-307"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; What exactly is meant by &amp;ldquo;Six Sigma&amp;rdquo; varies quite a bit. And execution is critical to what makes one program succeed and another fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/07/six-sigma-pitfalls/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deming and Six Sigma</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/07/deming-and-six-sigma/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree aspects of Six Sigma are bad. I also think some aspects of Six Sigma are good. And I think the same things about TQM.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span id="more-97"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/09/07/deming-and-six-sigma/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Purpose of an Organization</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/16/purpose-of-an-organization/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/deming/bio"&gt;W. Edwards Deming&lt;/a&gt; described the purpose of an organization in &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0262541165/worldwidedemingw"&gt;New Economics&lt;/a&gt;, on page 51, as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The aim proposed here for any organization is for everybody to gain &amp;ndash; stockholders, employees, suppliers, customers, community, the environment &amp;ndash; over the long term.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/16/purpose-of-an-organization/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science and Engineering Macroeconomic Investment</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/10/science-and-engineering-macroeconomic-investment/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The United States has benefited tremendously from the decisions to fund the National Science Foundation (as well as other investments in science) for decades. Other countries have seen the wisdom in those investments and seem to be committing much more to those investments than the US lately. I think it is very wise of them and will serve the world well. But I fear the United States has already allowed itself to lose a great deal of the competitive advantage it built up in the middle of the last century.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the last couple decades we have been able to coast on the lead we had. We could have many of the best minds come to our colleges and then keep them here once they graduated with advanced degrees. However, the lead we had is rapidly being eliminated. This does not mean the US will immediately be uncompetitive. But it will mean one of the great advantages we had will be greatly reduced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States still has competitive advantages that will continue to serve us well in harnessing advanced technology for economic gain. But others have been making strategic decisions to gain some of those advantages for themselves. And the United States will almost certainly continue to see its scientific and engineering leadership in the world erode. And the economic consequences will be dramatic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/10/science-and-engineering-macroeconomic-investment/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Design of Experiments in Advertising (2005)</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/09/design-of-experiments-in-advertising/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It is great to see the application of Designed Experiments increasing. I am reminded of an article by my father, William G. Hunter, from 1975: &lt;a href="http://williamghunter.net/articles/101-ways-to-design-an-experiment"&gt;101 Ways to Design an Experiment, or Some Ideas About Teaching Design of Experiments&lt;/a&gt;. Examples of the topics of the designed experiments his students performed:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="more-82"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;taste of stewed chicken&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;toys child chose to sleep with&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;quality of ground malt for brewing beer&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;distance football was kicked&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;absorption characteristics of activated carbon used with municipal waste water&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/09/design-of-experiments-in-advertising/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>W. Edwards Deming’s Seven Deadly Diseases</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/07/demings-seven-deadly-diseases/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Seven Deadly Diseases&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Lack of constancy of purpose&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Emphasis on short term profits (Overreaction to short term variation is harmful to long term success. With such focus on relatively unimportant short term results focus on constancy of purpose is next to impossible.)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Evaluation of performance, merit rating or annual review (see:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.pscholtes.com/pscholtes/perfwo.cfm"&gt;Performance Without Appraisal: What to do Instead of Performance Appraisals&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;by Peter Scholtes).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Mobility of top management (too much turnover causes numerous problems)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Managing by use of visible figures, with little of no consideration of figures that are unknown or unknowable.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/08/07/demings-seven-deadly-diseases/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jeff Bezos on Lean Thinking (2005)</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/29/bezos-on-lean-thinking/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read a book recently about Toyota&amp;rsquo;s lean production methodology, which is very interesting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/29/bezos-on-lean-thinking/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stock Market Capitalization by Country from 2000 to 2016</title>
      <link>http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2017/10/09/stock-market-capitalization-by-country-from-2000-to-2016/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One way to view the dominance of mega-companies is that the market cap for the top 4 stocks exceeds the market cap of all of Canada&amp;rsquo;s stocks (Apple $807 billion + Alphabet $687 billion + Microsoft $588 billion + Facebook $507 billion = $2.589 trillion). The next, Amazon $477 billion, bring the total for the top 5 to over $3 trillion (and surpasses the UK market cap, leaving only USA, China and Japan as larger markets).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USA market capitalization was at 46.9% of the global market cap in 2000 and fell to 31.6% in 2000 before rising to 42% in 2016. China grew from 1.8% of world stock market capitalization in 2000 to 6.9% in 2012 and 11.2% in 2016. Adding Hong Kong to China&amp;rsquo;s totals shows 3.7% in 2000 with growth to to 12.2% in 2012 and 16.2% in 2016.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may be surprised to learn that &lt;a href="http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2016/05/24/foreign-ownership-of-usa-stocks-reached-26-in-2015/"&gt;26% of USA equities are owned by investors outside the USA&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2017/10/09/stock-market-capitalization-by-country-from-2000-to-2016/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Estate Tax Repeal is a Very Bad Idea</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/28/estate-tax-repeal/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The estate tax is the most capitalist tax that exists. Capitalism, which some seem to think is based on people inheriting assets from their relatives, is not. Capitalism is based on the concept that each person gets to receive rewards for their work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Long before Adam Smith, noble rich passed on their wealth to their heirs. It was not Capitalist then and it is not Capitalist now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You have to have some taxes to run the government. The income tax is a poor tool, as it is a direct disincentives to positive economic activity. The best tax is one that doesn&amp;rsquo;t take anything from someone who earned it. And that is exactly what the estate does, tax a portion of the millions someone is given.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The income tax, however, is the largest source of income and therefore it will not disappear. But if you are going to lower taxes, that is the tax you should lower not one on people being given millions of dollars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/28/estate-tax-repeal/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Toyota CEO’s Views (2005)</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/22/new-toyota-ceos-views/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toyota has grown in the past few years, but [there&amp;rsquo;s a risk] that a belief that the current status is satisfactory creeps into the minds of employees. That&amp;rsquo;s what I&amp;rsquo;m worried about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should never be satisfied with the current status. In each division, function, or region, we still have numerous problems to cope with. We need to identify each one of those tasks or problems and fully recognize them and pursue the causes. This needs to be done by all the people working for Toyota.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/22/new-toyota-ceos-views/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fast Company Interview: Jeff Immelt</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/14/fast-company-interview-jeff-immelt/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My guess would be that what lead to this quote is not a lack of understanding that managers need the same qualities today they needed 10 years ago but the compulsion to feed the media frenzy for some incredible new insight. It just isn&amp;rsquo;t sexy to say &amp;ldquo;we need the same leadership qualities we needed in the past.&amp;rdquo; Deming stressed the importance of these &amp;ldquo;new&amp;rdquo; qualities he states more than 50 years ago and I think most decent managers have know you need to &amp;ldquo;know why we&amp;rsquo;re doing them&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Customer focus and innovation would also be at the top of the list of important issues and were 10 years ago and will be 20 years from now. What is important for management does not change much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;occasionally innovation is so dramatic it drastically changes the practice of management, two examples:&lt;br /&gt;1) the use of information technology&lt;br /&gt;2) the whole quality movement [&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/deming/guide"&gt;Deming&amp;rsquo;s ideas&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/spc"&gt;SPC&lt;/a&gt;, Toyota/Lean,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.curiouscat.net/library/sixsigmalibrary.cfm"&gt;Six Sigma&lt;/a&gt;&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/14/fast-company-interview-jeff-immelt/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management is Prediction</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/14/management-is-prediction/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe Deming&amp;rsquo;s thoughts about prediction are most effectively put into action using the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/pdsa.cfm"&gt;PDSA cycle&lt;/a&gt;. Specifically, you must predict the results in the planning phase (prior to piloting improvements). I find that this is rarely done. I don&amp;rsquo;t think the form of that prediction is critical (narrative with loose numerical guesses, precise numerical prediction&amp;hellip;). The critical issue is making the prediction, then comparing the results to that prediction and then figuring out how your original understanding can be improved based on the new data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="more-71"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Learning will not only be about the specific case being examined, but also, over time, learning about your tendencies in prediction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/14/management-is-prediction/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Managing Fear</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/12/managing-fear/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A good article on this topic is,&amp;nbsp;Managing Fear&amp;nbsp;by Gerald Suarez (who I worked with for several years). There are also 3 videos on this topic by Dr. Suarez, available from Management Wisdom, the producers of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://vimeo.com/ondemand/6853"&gt;Deming Library videos&lt;/a&gt;. I must admit I didn&amp;rsquo;t really understand the effects of fear and anxiety on performance until hearing Dr. Suarez speak on the topic many years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/12/managing-fear/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Could Toyota Fix GM</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/10/could-toyota-fix-gm/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Toyota could fix GM. Even the right leaders and managers, within GM, could fix GM but it is a huge long term job and it would be harder to do it internally because you will have to do it while competing with Toyota. Also they have some difficult issues to deal with since their previous managers did not tihnk of the long term (20-50 years out from the decisions they were making in the 70s though 90s).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t buy GM if I were Toyota, though. Why bother.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span id="more-69"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Just grow Toyota, it is working very well so far. It makes sense to buy if you need to grow quickly to gain critical mass, or you will lose the opportunity to grow early in a fast moving market. High tech companies (like Cisco and Intel) often do well buying other companies &amp;ndash; but just as often high tech companies make more mistakes buying than is justified by the successes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/10/could-toyota-fix-gm/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Millennium Development Goals</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/09/millennium-development-goals/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree it would be greatly beneficial if the method to reach those goals included a measurement system that provided good outcome and process measures (not just activity measures like spend so many billion dollars). And those measures were used to help determine what was working well and what was not. And then resources were focused where they had been effectively used and where they were not changes were made. The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/pdsa.cfm"&gt;PDSA method&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;should be used to test out potential good ideas on a small scale and then measure the success and invest in things that work and don&amp;rsquo;t invest in cases when results are bad. The failure to focus on results, and basing development efforts on all sorts of ill conceived considerations, is a large part of the reason many of the problems are as bad as they are now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think there is hope for progress in the attempts to improve the situation for people worldwide. However, it will not be easy. A great first step would be to hold accountable those leading the effort (the United Nations, individual countries [most especially the security council, etc.). If we could even get to the point where the progress was visible and failures were an embarrassment to those in power, then we will increase the odds of success. But I doubt failing to reach the outcome measures will be seen as a problem that must be addressed and fixed, instead of explained away.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/09/millennium-development-goals/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota as Homebuilder</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/08/toyota-as-homebuilder/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;many organizations don&amp;rsquo;t apply many concepts that have been proven effective for decades. So I hope Toyota gets into any business that continues to provide lousy value to the consumer (at least those where that consumer is me). I wish they would create their own credit card (they offer Toyota branded Visa and MasterCard credit cards now, in Japan), provide high speed internet service and run an airline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toyota is probably too smart to try and run an airline in the US (only Southwest seems to be able to that profitably).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the Toyota web site they list the following areas of &lt;a href="http://www.toyota-global.com/company/profile/non_automotive_business/"&gt;non-automotive Toyota business&lt;/a&gt;:&amp;nbsp;financial services,&amp;nbsp;information and communications,&amp;nbsp;marine&amp;nbsp;and most surprisingly&amp;nbsp;Biotechnology and Afforestation. Toyota states: &amp;ldquo;Biotechnology may seem far removed from the auto industry. It is, however, closely related to automaking in the context that they are both aiming to achieve a sustainable society, and their close relationship can be seen in the new Raum, launched in May 2003, which uses parts made from bioplastics.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/07/08/toyota-as-homebuilder/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Targets Distorting the System</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/13/targets-distorting-the-system/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I still remember Dr. Brian Joiner speaking about process improvement and the role of data well over a decade ago. He spoke of 3 ways to improve the figures: distort the data, distort the system and improve the system. Improving the system is the most difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/13/targets-distorting-the-system/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Targets Distorting the System</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/13/targets-distorting-the-system/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I still remember Dr. Brian Joiner speaking about process improvement and the role of data well over a decade ago. He spoke of 3 ways to improve the figures: distort the data, distort the system and improve the system. Improving the system is the most difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/13/targets-distorting-the-system/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dilbert and Deming</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/05/dilbert-and-deming/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dilbert can show the silliness that is common place in many workplaces, as just that &amp;ndash; silly. Point 10 of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/demings14points.cfm"&gt;Deming&amp;rsquo;s 14 points&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;called on management to eliminate slogans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The text works well for me, but I think Dilbert provides a great service in pointing out the same idea that such slogans are silly and even harmful in a way many others find more accessible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/06/05/dilbert-and-deming/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC chief quotes Deming</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/sec-chief-quotes-deming/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security and Exchange Chairman William H. Donaldson:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;This approach will, ultimately, better serve investors, and it will also gradually temper the pressures on some corporate executives to fudge the numbers. It would behoove us all to remember the words of W. Edwards Deming: &amp;ldquo;People with targets, and jobs dependent on meeting them, will probably meet the targets &amp;ndash; even if they have to destroy the enterprise to do it.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/sec-chief-quotes-deming/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: Good Service not Arbitrage (2005)</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/google-good-service-not-arbitrage/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google, to use a internet bubble phrase, is doing a good job monetizing eyeballs. However, that is not arbitrage it is just doing a good job of maximizing revenue and profits. Yes Google is able to make money because they are paid more by advertisers than it costs them to deliver what the advertisers want. But I don&amp;rsquo;t see how that is more like arbitrage than Toyota selling a car for more than it costs them to make the car.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/google-good-service-not-arbitrage/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: Good Service not Arbitrage</title>
      <link>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/google-good-service-not-arbitrage/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google, to use a internet bubble phrase, is doing a good job monetizing eyeballs. However, that is not arbitrage it is just doing a good job of maximizing revenue and profits. Yes Google is able to make money because they are paid more by advertisers than it costs them to deliver what the advertisers want. But I don&amp;rsquo;t see how that is more like arbitrage than Toyota selling a car for more than it costs them to make the car.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/16/google-good-service-not-arbitrage/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Traffic Congestion and a Non-Solution</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/09/traffic-congestion-and-a-non-solution/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For decades traffic congestion has been a problem in American cities and one that has continued to get worse. The typical proposed solution is to increase the number of roads. The theory behind this solution is not normally stated but, I believe, it amounts to: &amp;ldquo;if we build more roads then the system will have more capacity which has to decrease congestion.&amp;rdquo; Unfortunately this theory fails to take into account the past data on the increasing capacity of roads &amp;ldquo;solution.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ackoff&amp;rsquo;s solution does require actually changing the system. That is not easy to accomplish. However, if the desire is to reduce congestion the solution is not likely to be to just keep doing what we have been doing (given that it isn&amp;rsquo;t working). Building more and more capacity doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem to achieve the desired results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/05/09/traffic-congestion-and-a-non-solution/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 stocks for 10 years</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/04/22/10-stocks-for-10-years/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The 10 stocks I came up with are (closing price on 22 April 2005 &amp;ndash; % of portofilo invested):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF &amp;ndash; 16.40 &amp;ndash; 16%) &amp;ndash; a closed end mutual fund investing in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore&amp;hellip; This one doesn&amp;rsquo;t fit the criteria but does a great job of filling out the portfolio in my opinion.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Dell (DELL &amp;ndash; 36.43 &amp;ndash; 12%)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Toyota (TM &amp;ndash; 72.42 &amp;ndash; 12%)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Google (GOOG &amp;ndash; 215.81 &amp;ndash; 12%)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Pfizer (PFE &amp;ndash; 27.22 &amp;ndash; 8%)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Amazon (AMZN &amp;ndash; 33.04 &amp;ndash; 8%) They are only just starting to generate cash but I like their prospects.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;["I should have picked Apple instead of Dell but&amp;nbsp;even with that mistake the fund did very well - I did &lt;a href="http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2010/10/27/12-stocks-for-10-years-oct-2010-update/"&gt;add Apple in 2010&lt;/a&gt;"&amp;nbsp;John, Oct 2017]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/04/22/10-stocks-for-10-years/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance without Appraisal</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/04/02/performance-without-appraisal/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the short article&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://pscholtes.com/pscholtes/performance/"&gt;Performance Without Appraisal: What to do Instead of Performance Appraisals&lt;/a&gt;, Peter wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="cite"&gt;Dr. Deming said of Performance Appraisals, &amp;ldquo;Stop doing them and things will get better.&amp;rdquo; He was correct. Many organizations, however, wonder what to do instead.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those that do require &amp;ldquo;some alternative&amp;rdquo; Peter included some good ideas in&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1576750760/worldwidedemingw"&gt;The Leader&amp;rsquo;s Handbook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;(see chapter 9 &amp;ldquo;Performance without Appraisal pages 293 to 368). This chapter has excellent material for any manager.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/04/02/performance-without-appraisal/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Influences My Management Improvement Thinking?</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/03/10/who-influences-your-thinking/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Who influences my thinking on Management Improvement:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.williamghunter.net/"&gt;Bill Hunter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://pscholtes.com/"&gt;Peter Scholtes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/guides/demingbio.cfm"&gt;W. Edwards Deming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.curiouscat.com/guides/ackoffbio.cfm"&gt;Russel Ackoff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.curiouscat.com/management/box.cfm"&gt;George Box&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscat.net/authors/15-Brian-Joiner"&gt;Brian Joiner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/03/10/who-influences-your-thinking/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statistics for Experimenters – Second Edition</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/03/08/statistics-for-experimenters-second-edition/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Complete with applications covering the physical, engineering, biological, and social sciences, Statistics for Experimenters is designed for individuals who must use statistical approaches to conduct an experiment, but do not necessarily have formal training in statistics. Experimenters need only a basic understanding of mathematics to master all the statistical methods presented. This text is an essential reference for all researchers and is a highly recommended course book for undergraduate and graduate students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This updates the classic text by &lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/experts/george-box"&gt;George Box&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://williamghunter.net/"&gt;William Hunter&lt;/a&gt; (my father) and Stu Hunter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/03/08/statistics-for-experimenters-second-edition/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Control Charts in Health Care</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/02/26/control-charts-in-health-care/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The point of using a control chart, and many of the management improvement tools, are to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of resources spent improving. The trick is not really to improve (that is pretty easy) the trick is to improve quickly and effectively (and in a competitive marketplace to improve more quickly than competitors). Where improvement resources are targeted is critical. In deciding which improvement options to explore it is important to understand the impact on the outcome (in this case the health of the patient).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/02/26/control-charts-in-health-care/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory of Knowledge</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/29/theory-of-knowledge/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When managing many fail to predict when attempting to test improvement ideas through what should be experiments (often they are just changes without verification the change produced a desired effect, any learning or study of the results of the change). Without prediction learning is much less (if there is any at all) than it would be with such prediction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With, even a fairly simple understanding of the theory of knowledge the effectiveness of management improvement efforts are greatly increased. This topic is difficult for most to understand, I recommend reading chapter four of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0262541165/worldwidedemingw"&gt;the New Economics&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/29/theory-of-knowledge/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Designing a New Organization</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/22/designing-a-new-organization/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ackoff has done a huge amount of work in idealized design and thinking about the big ideas that can drive dramatic change. His ideas are exceptional. He even offers a plan for modeling the idealized organization and then a plan for how to transform the organization based on practical ideas that are feasible in the real world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/22/designing-a-new-organization/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price Discrimination in the Internet Age</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/18/price-discrimination-in-the-internet-age/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The argument that you need to cripple products by geographic area to cope with currency fluctuations is false. It might be that a company wants to practice Price Discrimination&amp;nbsp;to charge more where they can get more and less where they can get less. In the view of such a company, the internet, and other factors, have made it increasingly easy for people to buy in the low cost region and resell the items in the region where the company wants to charge higher prices. If you want to keep practicing price descrimination as a company you have to erect barriers to the free trade of your products by your customers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/18/price-discrimination-in-the-internet-age/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Operational Excellence</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/15/operational-excellence/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Saying the organization is focuses on new principles (partnering, lean, etc.) is not the same as applying those principles with the great success that Toyota does. That difference is huge and is driving many companies to outsource and try to dramatically cut costs. Reducing costs should be the outcome of improving efficiency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toyota is successful manufacturing in the USA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would agree that many companies don&amp;rsquo;t understand the critical importance of management excellence. Rather than take the difficult path to lead real change in their organization they focus on simple cost cutting measures (though usually not cutting executive salaries which have grown dramatically and are excessive in the USA compared to the rest of the world). That won&amp;rsquo;t work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Nov 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/15/operational-excellence/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drug Prices in the USA</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/08/drug-prices-in-the-usa/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is the contention that without the ability to overcharge American&amp;rsquo;s the drug companies won&amp;rsquo;t invest in Research and Development. This is such a poor argument I can&amp;rsquo;t believe people can make it without suffering a big blow to any credibility they had. Obviously drug development has a very high cost (creating a high fixed cost) and often drug manufacture has a small marginal cost (though at times the marginal cost is also high). Right now the companies count on the American market to provide funds for much of the research, development, marketing and profits. Then they sell the drugs in other markets only looking to maximize profits looking at marginal costs. Obviously, if they no longer could count on excessive prices in the United States they would have to spread the fixed cost over the rest of the world. The argument that they won&amp;rsquo;t invest in research and development without excessive costs in America is false. They would adjust their pricing structures around the world based on losing the cash cow of the American consumer. That should be obvious to anyone who even took one economics course.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2005/01/08/drug-prices-in-the-usa/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taguchi Loss Function</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/10/14/taguchi-loss-function/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In practice, I have seen the concept of the Taguchi Loss Function used quite a bit. I have never actually seen any losses quantified and totaled and shown on a graph. I think focusing specifically on who suffers a loss and what that loss could be, can help. I think actually quantifying the losses to society can be daunting. So, while I see the value in framing the concept that way I think to actually get the losses quantified you are best served by starting with those closest to the process and then adding additional loses to those results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, if you attempt to use the concept to help you manage (as a guide in decision making) the impacts to society are a factor, but, I think the loss to your company, the customer and perhaps the end user are most important. A negative impact to society at large is not going to have the same impact to a decision maker as the same negative impact to the customer. The decision maker will likely be willing to invest more to reduce the loss to a customer than to society at large (and that seems logical and sensible to me).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/10/14/taguchi-loss-function/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management Improvement History</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/09/23/management-improvement-history/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I do believe we need to improve our practice of Quality (and to do that we need to understand what happened in the past and why it was not more successful). The idea that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/doe"&gt;Design of Experiments&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(DoE) was at the core of some Quality Movement to me is not at all accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="more-11"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my experience only a few Quality professionals today understand what it means and how it should be applied. The idea that it was common place in the 40&amp;rsquo;s I seriously doubt (though I don&amp;rsquo;t have first hand knowledge of this). I find it difficult to believe we would have decided to stop using DoE if it was commonly done previously. The understanding I have from those that should know (like&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.curiouscat.com/management/experts/george-box"&gt;George Box&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and previously my father &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://williamghunter.net/"&gt;Bill Hunter&lt;/a&gt;) is that it was not at all common practice and still is not outside of a few industries and even there it is isolated in the domain of a few experts.I do have first hand knowledge of the 80&amp;rsquo;s and the idea that we did &amp;ldquo;employee training in problem solving, team activities and just-in-time inventory&amp;rdquo; well is not even close to accurate. We sent people to training on these things but other than JIT inventory the effectiveness of these efforts were poor (with a few exceptions that really did well).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Quality&amp;rdquo; is not being practiced anywhere close to the level with which I am satisfied with in more than a few organizations. We have huge improvements to make in the practice of DoE, SPC, process improvement, having decisions made by the appropriate level (as close to the issue as possible), leadership, teamwork, data based decision making, the use of basically all the Quality tools, systems thinking, transformation&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/09/23/management-improvement-history/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dangers of Forgetting the Proxy Nature of Data</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/08/29/dangers-of-forgetting-proxy-nature-of-data/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We use data to act as a proxy for some results of the system. Often people forget that the desired end result is not for the number to be improved but for the situation to be improved. We hope, if the measure improves the situation will have improved. But there are many reasons this may not be the case (one number improving at the expense of other parts of the system, the failure of the number to accurately serve as a proxy, distorting numbers, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find something I learned from Brian Joiner an excellent summary &amp;ndash; which I remember as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data (measuring a system) can be improved by&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;distorting the system&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;distorting the data or&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;improving the system (which tends to be more difficult though likely what is desired)&lt;br /&gt;Brian Joiner&amp;rsquo;s book,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0070327157/worldwidedemingw"&gt;4th Generation Management&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is a great book for managers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2004/08/29/dangers-of-forgetting-proxy-nature-of-data/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cliff Palace, Mesa Verde National Park</title>
      <link>https://blog.curious-cat-travel.net/2017/06/cliff-palace-mesa-verde-national-park/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sometime during the late 1190s, after primarily living on the mesa top for 600 years, many Ancestral Pueblo people began living in pueblos they built beneath the overhanging cliffs. The structures ranged in size from one-room storage units to villages of more than 150 rooms. While still farming the mesa tops, they continued to reside in the alcoves, repairing, remodeling, and constructing new rooms for nearly a century.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.curious-cat-travel.net/2017/06/cliff-palace-mesa-verde-national-park/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Importance of Critical Thinking and Challenging Assumptions</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/07/12/the-importance-of-critical-thinking-and-challenging-assumptions/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Critical thinking is important to applying management improvement methods effectively. It is important to know when decisions are based on evidence and when decisions are not based on evidence. It can be fine to base some decisions on principles that are not subject to rational criticism. But it is important to understand the thought process that is taken to make each decision. If we are not clear on the basis (evidence or opinion regardless of evidence) we cannot be as effective in targeting our efforts to evaluate the results and continually improve the processes in our organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Changing the culture to one that values understanding and learning takes time. That process must be done with an understanding of psychology and the challenges of getting people to evaluate decisions. Creating a culture where it is expected that people think about the evidence and are comfortable explaining and defending the reasoning behind decisions is extremely important.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/07/12/the-importance-of-critical-thinking-and-challenging-assumptions/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Matt Heusser</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-matt-heusser</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hexawise&lt;/strong&gt;: You have written about the benefits of&amp;nbsp;lean thinking in software testing. What advantages do organizations gain when they adopt a lean thinking view of software testing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Matt&lt;/strong&gt;: You know that thing that happens, where you can't do your job because you filed a ticket and it will take the DBA's a week to add a column to a table, so you can't do your job, for a week?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or whatever else it is? Right now I've got a contractor billing on my team with no laptop. He'll have it nine days after he started ... if we're lucky.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typically, when a company goes to lean thinking, that kind of stuff stops happening.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-matt-heusser</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technological Innovation and Management</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/06/07/technological-innovation-and-management/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations need to be designed to be robust and to cope well with the increasingly rapid pace of transformative innovation. This again reinforces the importance of management improvement practices that I have been writing about here (on the Curious Cat Management Improvement blog) for more than 10 years. Organizations that do not&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2012/07/09/customer-focus-2/"&gt;delight customers&lt;/a&gt;, know the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2012/12/12/customers/"&gt;jobs to be done that their customers have&lt;/a&gt;, focus on the future (long term thinking),&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2010/07/22/actionable-metrics/"&gt;understand how to use data&lt;/a&gt;, have well designed processes that allow&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://curiouscat.com/management/dictionary/genchigenbutsu"&gt;those at the gemba&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to know what to do and know how to rapidly adjust based on new realities and possibilities are at great risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/06/07/technological-innovation-and-management/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessons on Competition from Mother Nature</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/30/new-lessons-on-competition-from-mother-nature/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Too often I see simplistic thinking used to accept that the results were good so what we did was wise or the results were bad so what we did was unwise. Sometimes those conclusions have merit. Sometimes they don&amp;rsquo;t. The results matter but understanding the nature of those results is important. Was it due to luck (did our company due well because the overall market boomed and we were taken along for the ride). Was it due to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2013/11/14/taking-risks-based-on-evidence/"&gt;taking risks&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that happened to work out well now but is likely to result in bad results in the future? Is it just random variation that we attribute to good luck?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/30/new-lessons-on-competition-from-mother-nature/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving Management with Tools and Knowledge</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/10/improvement-management-with-tools-and-knowledge/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Both the tools and the underlying principles are catalysts to better management. Alone each can result in a bit of improvement. But when they are used together is when you see remarkable improvement. The effective integration of the principles and the tools is what separates the remarkable companies we respect (and maybe envy) from all the others that are having some success but that are also struggling in many ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/10/improvement-management-with-tools-and-knowledge/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Organizations as Social Systems</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/02/organizations-as-social-systems/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations are social systems made up of people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Social systems often amplify what happens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If good things happen, more good things often follow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When bad things happen, more bad things often follow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To improve it is wise to this into account and design elements of the management system to encourage the amplification of what is good and that seeks to stop what is bad from being amplified.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/05/02/organizations-as-social-systems/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Ajay Balamurugadas</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-ajay-balamurugadas</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ajay:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;To be convincing, you might have to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2010/02/09/circle-of-influence/"&gt;work on your reputation first&lt;/a&gt;. Work on it. People most of the times say "No" until they are convinced. Once you highlight the benefits of pairing and collaboration, people will listen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-ajay-balamurugadas</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Michael Bolton</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-michael-bolton</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Bolton is a consulting software tester and testing teacher who helps people solve testing problems that they didn&amp;rsquo;t realize they could solve. He is the co-author (with senior author James Bach) of&amp;nbsp;Rapid Software Testing, a methodology and mindset for testing software expertly and credibly in uncertain conditions and under extreme time pressure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-michael-bolton</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a Deep Commitment to Delighting Customers</title>
      <link>https://blog.deming.org/2017/04/creating-a-deep-commitment-to-delighting-customers/</link>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those organizations that can delight customers today and take the steps today that position the organization to delight customers in the future will prosper and grow. But building and maintaining a management culture that reinforces delighting customers and long term thinking is quite difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Successfully delighting customers requires much more than a wish that customers were delighted with our organization. It requires&amp;nbsp;knowing what your customers want&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/01/10/cater-to-customers-desires-to-achieve-customer-delight/"&gt;creating system that can reliably delivering that to customers&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.deming.org/2017/04/creating-a-deep-commitment-to-delighting-customers/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Johor Bahru, Malaysia Luxury Condo Market Needs the MRT to Singapore to be Completed Quickly</title>
      <link>https://johor-bahru-real-estate.com/2017/05/06/the-johor-bahru-luxury-condo-market-needs-the-mrt-to-singapore-to-be-completed-quickly/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://malaysia.curiouscatnetwork.com/2015/05/07/timeline-for-extending-singapores-mrt-to-johor-bahru-slips-into-2020-or-beyond/"&gt;In 2015 the timeline for extending the Singapore MRT to Johor Bahru was extended to 2020&lt;/a&gt;. Now, the latest I have read is that it is being delayed further &amp;ndash; until 2022. There is likely no other factor more important to reduce the supply demand imbalance for luxury condos than getting a good MRT solution into operation. Next would likely be a 3rd road link. Next is the need for adding many more high paying jobs in Johor Bahru than has been the case so far. These 3 areas should be the main areas of focus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://johor-bahru-real-estate.com/2017/05/06/the-johor-bahru-luxury-condo-market-needs-the-mrt-to-singapore-to-be-completed-quickly/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elephants Learn to Cooperate to Reach Their Objective</title>
      <link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/06/10/elephants-learn-to-cooperate-to-reach-their-objective/</link>
      <description>This clip shows elephants learning to work together to achieve what they can’t achieve alone (from BBC’s Super Smart Animals). It is interesting to see what animals are capable of.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/06/10/elephants-learn-to-cooperate-to-reach-their-objective/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Follow me on Twitter @aJohnHunter</title>
      <link>http://curiouscatlinks.blogspot.com/2017/07/follow-me-on-twitter-ajohnhunter.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Follow me on Twitter &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/aJohnHunter" rel="nofollow"&gt;@aJohnHunter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also I provide a resource &lt;a href="http://johnhunter.com/john_hunter_online"&gt;showing how find links to me elsewhere online&lt;/a&gt; for those that are interested.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://curiouscatlinks.blogspot.com/2017/07/follow-me-on-twitter-ajohnhunter.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots for Health Care from Toyota</title>
      <link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/12/robots-for-health-care-from-toyota/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most often innovation efforts take the form of &lt;a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2012/07/09/customer-focus-2/"&gt;understanding the jobs your customers are using your products and service for now and developing new solutions&lt;/a&gt; to delight those customers. This is difficult for companies to pull of successfully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Occasionally innovation involves meeting completely new needs of customers. For example Toyota started as a loom company and is now known as a car company. Making such a radical change is not often successful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will Toyota be able to add robots to the products it produces successfully?&amp;nbsp;I believe they have a chance. But it won&amp;rsquo;t be easy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/12/robots-for-health-care-from-toyota/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Wisconsin</title>
      <link>http://blog.curious-cat-travel.net/2017/04/apostle-islands-national-lakeshore-wisconsin/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Photos from my visit to the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in northern Wisconsin. &amp;nbsp;The park on the shores of Lake Superior provides some wondeful hikes and boat rides to take in the natural world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://blog.curious-cat-travel.net/2017/04/apostle-islands-national-lakeshore-wisconsin/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We are Not Us Without The Microbes Within Us</title>
      <link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/16/we-are-not-us-without-the-microbes-within-us/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Avoiding bacteria is not feasible. Our bodies have evolved with this constant interaction with bacteria for millions of years. When we are healthy bacteria have footholds that make it difficult for other bacteria to gain a foothold (as does our immune system fighting off those bacteria it doesn&amp;rsquo;t recognize or that it recognized as something to fight).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Human health is a fascinating topic. It is true antibiotics have provided us great tools in the service of human health. But we have resorted to that &amp;ldquo;hammer&amp;rdquo; far too often. And the consequences of doing so is not understood. We need those scientists exploring the complex interactions we contain to continue their great work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/16/we-are-not-us-without-the-microbes-within-us/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Scientific Knowledge to Drive Policies that Create a Better World</title>
      <link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/02/using-scientific-knowledge-to-drive-policies-that-create-a-better-world/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We can&amp;rsquo;t afford to elect people that don&amp;rsquo;t have an understanding of how to make wise decisions or&amp;nbsp;how to ensure scientific knowledge forms the basis of policy when it should, such as: overfishing, &lt;a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2013/10/19/outdoor-air-pollution-resulted-in-223000-cancer-deaths-in-2010/"&gt;pollution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2009/12/06/unless-we-take-decisive-action-climate-change-will-ravage-our-planet/"&gt;global warming&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2010/06/27/vaccines-cant-provide-miraculous-results-if-we-dont-take-them/"&gt;health care benefits vaccines provide when they are used properly&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2013/03/08/cdc-again-stresses-urgent-need-to-adjust-practices-or-pay-a-steep-price/"&gt;dangers of abusing antibiotics&lt;/a&gt;, etc..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to elect leaders like those that took the steps to have the EPA clean up the incredibly polluted USA. We need to elect leaders that put the policies in place to reduce the overfishing in our waters. We need to elect leaders that care about our country and will learn what they need to from those that know the science.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2017/04/02/using-scientific-knowledge-to-drive-policies-that-create-a-better-world/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New International Banking Solution for Small Business and Digital Nomads</title>
      <link>https://moneyite.com/2017/05/new-international-banking-solution-for-small-business-and-digital-nomads/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the significant hassles of a the new digital economy is that national borders are largely irrelevant to digital businesses but the banking infrastructure is still stuck in the past. Dealing with international payments is a hassle and can be expensive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New businesses are disrupting the old banks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://moneyite.com/2017/05/new-international-banking-solution-for-small-business-and-digital-nomads/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Transformation is Everybody’s Job</title>
      <link>https://blog.deming.org/2017/04/the-transformation-is-everybodys-job/</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are quotes you can pick to make it seem like executives are responsible for the system and individuals workers have little impact on overall results &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://blog.deming.org/2015/02/a-bad-system-will-beat-a-good-person-every-time/"&gt;A bad system will beat a good person every time&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;rdquo; This shows the limitation of isolated quotes more than anything else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Complex systems have many leverage points and can be influenced in many ways. It is unreasonable to have a broken management system and blame those working within it for the naturally poor results than such a system creates. And executives have more authority and thus more responsibility for creating a good management system that is continually improving. But such a management system requires that everyone in the organization is contributing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those with authority must modify the management system to allow everyone to contribute. But that doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean everyone else just sits by waiting for those with more authority to transform the organization. Transformation doesn&amp;rsquo;t work that way. It is a dynamic, interconnected process. It isn&amp;rsquo;t as simple as turning on a light (or declaring this is our new transformed management system).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.deming.org/2017/04/the-transformation-is-everybodys-job/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Mike Bland</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-mike-bland</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This interview with Mike Bland is part of my series of &amp;ldquo;Testing Smarter with&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; interviews: gaining insights and experiences from many of the software testing field&amp;rsquo;s leading thinkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it&amp;rsquo;s not about defects; it&amp;rsquo;s about feedback and collaboration. If you arrange incentives to produce an adversarial relationship between team members, e.g. if developers are incentivized to minimize defects and testers are incentivized to report defects, then that&amp;rsquo;s a house divided against itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike Bland aims to produce a culture of transparency, autonomy, and collaboration, in which &amp;ldquo;Instigators&amp;rdquo; are inspired and encouraged to make creative use of existing systems to drive improvement throughout an organization. The ultimate goal of such efforts is to make the right thing the easy thing. He's followed this path since 2005, when he helped drive adoption of automated testing throughout Google as part of the Testing Grouplet, the Test Mercenaries, and the Fixit Grouplet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;my advice to both developers and testers is to identify the priorities, the social structures and dynamics at play in the organization. How can you work with these structures and dynamics instead of against them&amp;mdash;or do you need to create a culture of open communication and collaboration in parallel with (or even before) communicating the testing message?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-mike-bland</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Alan Page</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-alan-page</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This interview with Alan Page is part of my series of &amp;ldquo;Testing Smarter with&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; interviews: gaining insights and experiences from many of the software testing field&amp;rsquo;s leading thinkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest thing I look for in testers is a passion and ability to learn. I've interviewed hundreds of testers... The testers who really impress me are those who love to learn - not just about testing, but about many different things. Critical thinking and problem solving are also quite important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alan spent over twenty years at Microsoft working on a variety of operating systems and applications in nearly every Microsoft division and now works at Unity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hexawise.com/software-testing-glossary/combinatorial-testing"&gt;Combinatorial testing&lt;/a&gt; is actually pretty useful in game testing. For example, consider a role-playing game with six races, ten character classes, four different factions, plus a choice for gender. That's 480 unique combinations to test! Fortunately, this has been proven to be an area where isolating pairs (or triples) of variations makes testing possible, while still finding critical bugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/smarter-software-testing-with-alan-page</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with Dorothy Graham</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/testing-smarter-with-dorothy-graham</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This interview with Dorothy Graham is part of my series of &amp;ldquo;Testing Smarter with&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; interviews: gaining insights and experiences from many of the software testing field&amp;rsquo;s leading thinkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The best way to have fewer bugs in the software is not to put them in in the first place. I would like to see testers become bug prevention advisors! And I think this is what happens on good teams.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/testing-smarter-with-dorothy-graham</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Smarter with James Bach</title>
      <link>https://hexawise.com/posts/testing-smarter-with-james-bach</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is the first in a series of&amp;nbsp;interviews by me aimed at highlighting insights and experiences by many of the software testing field&amp;rsquo;s leading thinkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I test them using social science methods. That, after all, is how scientists attempt to test their theories about social life. That means an emphasis on qualitative analysis, but bringing in statistical methods whenever applicable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree that the medical world is a good example of where statistical methods and heuristic approaches are also needed. In testing complex things, some of what you need to do includes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You must use time to your advantage-- observing systems over time the way primatologists observe chimps in the wild.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You must use Grounded Theory, beginning with immersion and observation, until patterns begin to reveal themselves.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hexawise.com/posts/testing-smarter-with-james-bach</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
