Blog posts on managing people

Rss logo

Posts selected fromManagement Blog - Engineering Blog - Investing Blog and other blogs

  • Marissa Mayer Webcast on Google Innovation
    1. Ideas come from anywhere (engineers, customers, managers, executives, external companies – that Google acquires)
    2. Share everything you can (very open culture)
    3. You’re Brilliant. We’re Hiring [Google Hiring]
    4. A license to pursue dreams (Google 20% time)
    5. Innovation not instant perfection (iteration – experiment quickly and often)
    6. Data is apolitical [Data Based Decision Making – this is true but as an operating principle requires people that really understand data. See: Data can’t lie.
    7. Creativity loves Constraints [process improvement and innovation]
    8. ...

    continue reading: Marissa Mayer Webcast on Google Innovation

  • Vacation: A Systems Thinking Perspective

    Health care insurance costs are high, if you can get 1900 hours of work a year for the health care premium instead of 1500 hours that can add up to a great deal of savings...

    continue reading: Vacation: A Systems Thinking Perspective

  • Dangers of Extrinsic Motivation

    Joel Spolsky notes that relying on extrinsic motivation to drive performance is an abdication of management.

    Instead of training developers on techniques of writing reliable code, you just absolve yourself of responsibility by paying them if they do. Now every developer has to figure it out on their own.

    continue reading: Dangers of Extrinsic Motivation

  • Competition

    Most aspects of Deming’s thinking seemed natural to me from the start. Some ideas have taken longer (it took me awhile to be won over to the harm caused by performance appraisals, for example). Competition is another area that I still struggle with. I have been moved greatly by my experience and the thoughts of people like Alfie Kohn (No Contest: The Case Against Competition).

    But I still hold more promise for some aspects of competition and I hold less concern than some about other aspects of competition. Still I agree that there is a good deal to learn about the dangers of competition which often creates havoc within a system.

    continue reading: Competition

  • Internet Access at Work (2006)

    Providing internet access at work can create some management issues. However, the correct solution to those problems is not to be overly restrictive on access to the internet.

    ...coach and work with your employees to make sure they behave responsibly. The information available on the internet can aid employees in doing their job in many ways. And it can also aid them in living their lives – don’t discount this benefit.

    continue reading: Internet Access at Work (2006)

  • Going lean Brings Long-term Payoffs

    The early successes provide resources to invest in making large more fundamental changes to the organization. Those successes also help convince people these lean ideas have merit. Dilbert does a good job of illustrating how many workers feel about the latest words spoken by their management. Without visible success expecting employees to believe the new management practices is unwise.

    continue reading: Going lean Brings Long-term Payoffs

  • Righter Performance Appraisal

    Just because it would be nice for performance appraisal to work doesn’t mean it does work. As Deming said some numbers are unknown and unknowable and the wish that it is possible to quantify the contributions of people doesn’t mean you can. People cling to the idea that performance appraisal is the only tool we have to manage performance so we must use it. Even if most people realize it is just a game that accomplishes little, if anything positive, and causes great frustration and animosity they persist. Hopefully performance appraisal will be seen as “artifact of the past” sometime soon.

    continue reading: Righter Performance Appraisal

  • Creating and Sustaining Great Management Systems

    It is hard enough to create and sustain great management systems without adding more challenges to achieving success. When the management system results in having credit for each success fought over (to allocate credit to whoever convinces others they deserve the credit) it is much harder.

    This is one of the many ways Performance appraisals schemes (where people have to claim responsibility for successes in order to get more cash) create problems.

    continue reading: Creating and Sustaining Great Management Systems

  • Sub-optimize a Part to Optimize the Whole

    ...choosing to sub optimize a part to optimize the whole. One of management’s roles is to determine when to trade a loss to one part of the system for the sake of the overall system. One of the big losses for software development is interruptions which distract developers.

    continue reading: Sub-optimize a Part to Optimize the Whole

  • European Blackout: Human Error-Not

    The focus seems to be that we didn’t do anything wrong, just some “human” made an error, which seems to be implied is out of their control. Why would the organization not be responsible for the people and the system working together? Management needs to create systems that works. That system includes people and equipment and process management and suppliers

    If management tries to claim a failure was due to "human error" they have to provide me a great deal more evidence on why the system was designed to allow that error (given that they say the error is "human" implies that they believe the system should have been able to cope with the situation). Requesting that evidence is the first thing reporters should ask any time they are given such excuses. At which time I imagine the response options are:

    1. no comment
    2.  we had considered this situation and looked at the likelihood of such an event, the cost of protecting against it (mistake proofing) and the cost of failure meant and decided that it wasn't worth the cost of preventing such failures
    3. we didn't think about it
    4. we think it is best not to design systems to be robust and mistake proof but rather rely on people to never make any mistakes

    What they will likely say is we have these 3 procedures in place to prevent that error.
    Are they every followed? You have something written on paper, big deal? What actually happens?
    Yes they are always followed by everybody, this one time was the only time ever that it was not followed. Why?
    This person made a mistake.
    Why did the system allow that mistake to be made?
    What? You can't expect us to design systems that prevent mistakes from being made.
    Yes I can. That is much more sensible than expecting people never to make a mistake.

    continue reading: European Blackout: Human Error-Not

  • Customer Focus at Ritz Carlton and Home Depot

    Ritz-Carlton’s motto is “We are ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen.” And they actually turn those words into reality. They are not platitudes with no action. The system is guided toward achieving that vision.

    continue reading: Customer Focus at Ritz Carlton and Home Depot

  • How to Improve

    Good management systems are about seeking systemic adoption of the most effective solutions.

    Here is a simple example. Years ago, my boss was frustrated because an award was sent to the Director’s office to be signed and the awardee’s name was spelled wrong (the third time an awardee’s name had been spelled wrong in a short period). After the first attempts my boss suggested these be checked and double checked… Which they already were but…

    I was assisting with efforts to adopt TQM and the time and when she told me the problem and I asked if the names were in the automated spell checker? They were not. I suggested we add them and use the system (automatic spell checking) designed to check for incorrect spelling to do the job. Shift from first looking to blame the worker to first seeing if there is way to improve the system is a simple but very helpful change to make.

    This example is simple but it points to a nearly universal truth: if an improvement amounts to telling people to do their job better (pay attention more, don’t be careless, some useless slogan…) that is not likely to be as effective as improving the process.

    continue reading: How to Improve

  • Why Extrinsic Motivation Fails

    Lean thinkers understand this idea as respect for people. Dr. Deming talked about joy in work.Douglas McGregor talked about theory x and theory y thinking. All of these perspectives incorporate an understanding of workplace systems and human psychology. Extrinsic motivation is easy but not effective. It is really just abdicating management and using extrinsic motivation in place of management. The alternative requires managers to actually manage. This is challenging but the correct choice to make.

    continue reading: Why Extrinsic Motivation Fails

  • Poor Service – Industry Standard?

    I find it very frustrating how poor the service is most everywhere these days. Have you shopped in a Trader Joe’s? The contrast is amazing. I am used to most employees, on the phone, or in person, seeing the customer as a bother.  At Trader Joe’s, in stark contrast, the staff always seems happy to have customers. Which seems like a good indication that management is doing a number of things right.

    continue reading: Poor Service – Industry Standard?

  • Performance Appraisals – Is Good Execution the Solution?

    Good execution of performance appraisal is not the solution. More people are realizing that improving how performance appraisal are done is an attempt to do the wrong thing better. If you insist on doing the wrong thing, I suppose you might as well do it better but how about just not doing the wrong thing at all? What should be done? See: Performance Without Appraisal and read chapter 9 of The Leader’s Handbook.

    continue reading: Performance Appraisals – Is Good Execution the Solution?